000 03325dam a2200397 i 4500
001 data
005 20260322212107.0
008 data
906 _a7
_bcbc
_corignew
_d1
_eecip
_f20
_gy-gencatlg
925 0 _aacquire
_b1 shelf copy
_xpolicy default
955 _wxm06 2019-04-24
_fxg34 2025-12-05 Copy 1 to LL
963 _aNewgen Knowledge Works; phone: +91-9083252430; email: [email protected]; bc: [email protected]
010 _a 2019019447
020 _a9781108485852
_qhardback
020 _a9781108725286
_qpaperback
035 _a20943760
040 _aDLC
_beng
_erda
_cDLC
042 _apcc
050 0 0 _aKZ6115
_b.L44 2019
082 0 0 _a341.5/22
_223
084 _aLAW051000
_2bisacsh
245 0 0 _aLegitimacy of unseen actors in international adjudication /
_cedited by Freya Baetens.
264 1 _aNew York, NY :
_aNew York, NY :
_bCambridge University Press,
_c2019.
300 _axxiii, 626 pages :
_billustrations ;
_c24 cm
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _aunmediated
_bn
_2rdamedia
338 _avolume
_bnc
_2rdacarrier
520 _a"'Unseen actors' are vital to the functioning of international courts and tribunals, exercising varying levels of influence on the adjudicatory process and its outcome. The last few decades have witnessed an expansion in the number of international judicial bodies. Although these bodies differ in their institutional make-up and functions, a characteristic shared among them is their reliance on the contribution of individuals or entities other than the judicial decision-makers themselves. Unseen actors may take the form of registries, secretariats, law clerks and legal officers, but they also include non-lawyers such as translators, members of the medical profession and scientific experts. Some of these actors may be 'more unseen' than others but most remain nameless in the written decisions, and the extent of their contribution is generally unclear. The opaqueness of their role, combined with the significance of the judicial decision for the parties involved as well as for a wider range of stakeholders, raises questions about the impact of these unseen actors on the legitimacy of international adjudication as such. For example, an unseen actor's influence has formed a ground upon which an arbitral award was challenged, as substantial parts had allegedly been written by a legal assistant rather than the arbitrators themselves. The domestic court adjudicating the dispute in first instance set aside the award on a different ground, so it did not address this point; the case is currently pending on appeal. This book aims to answer such legitimacy questions and identify 'best practices', where feasible, through a multifaceted enquiry into possible common connections and patterns in the institutional makeup and daily practice of international courts and tribunals"--
_cProvided by publisher.
490 0 _aStudies on international courts and tribunals
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
650 0 _aArbitration (International law)
650 0 _aJurisdiction (International law)
650 0 _aInternational courts.
650 7 _aLAW / International.
_2bisacsh
700 1 _aBaetens, Freya,
_eeditor.
999 _c1585
_d1585