000			03871cam a2200409 i 4500
001			data
005			20260322212105.0
008			data
035			_a19852570
906			_a7 _bcbc _ccopycat _d2 _encip _f20 _gy-gencatlg
925	0		_aacquire _b1 shelf copy _xpolicy default
010			_a 2016590916
020			_a9781107085589 _qhbk
020			_a1107085586 _qhbk
035			_a(OCoLC)958355036
040			_aYDX _beng _cYDX _erda _dDLC _dLSD _dOCLCF _dGZL _dRCJ _dFIE _dDLC
042			_alccopycat
050	0	0	_aK3165 _b.C5793 2017
082	0	4	_a340.11 _223
245	0	0	_aComparative constitutional reasoning / _cedited by András Jakab, Hungarian Academy of Sciences/Pázmany Péter Catholic University; Arthur Dyevre, KU Leuven Faculty of Law; Giulio Itzcovich, University of Brescia.
264		1	_aCambridge, United Kingdom : _bCambridge University Press, _c2017.
300			_axii, 854 pages : _billustrations ; _c24 cm
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia
338			_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505	0	0	_gConclusion / _tThe Supreme Court of the United States / _rAndrás Jakab, Arthur Dyevre and Giulio Itzcovich. _tThe High Court of Australia / _rCheryl Saunders and Adrienne Stone -- _tThe Austrian Constitutional Court / _rKonrad Lachmayer -- _tThe Supreme Federal Tribunal of Brazil / _rConrado Hübner Mendes -- _tThe Supreme Court of Canada / _rHugo Cyr and Monica Popescu -- _tThe Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic / _rZdeněk Kühn -- _tThe European Court of Human Rights / _rJanneke Gerards -- _tThe European Court of Justice / _rGiulio Itzcovich -- _tThe French Constitutional Council / _rArthur Dyevre -- _tThe German Federal Constitutional Court / _rMichaela Hailbronner and Stefan Martini -- _tThe Constitutional Court of Hungary / _rAndrás Jakab and Johanna Frölich -- _tThe Supreme Court of Ireland / _rEoin Carolan -- _tThe Israeli Supreme Court / _rSuzie Navot -- _tThe Constitutional Court of Italy / _rTania Groppi and Irene Spigno -- _tThe Constitutional Court of South Africa / _rChrista Rautenbach and Lourens du Plessis -- _tThe Spanish Constitutional Court / _rMarian Ahumada Ruiz -- _tThe Constitutional Court of Taiwan / _rWen-Chen Chang -- _tThe Supreme Court (House of Lords) of the United Kingdom / _rTamas Gyorfi -- _tThe Supreme Court of the United States / _rHoward Schweber and Jennifer L. Brookhart -- _gConclusion / _rAndrás Jakab, Arthur Dyevre and Giulio Itzcovich.
520			_aTo what extent is the language of judicial opinions responsive to the political and social context in which constitutional courts operate? Courts are reason-giving institutions, with argumentation playing a central role in constitutional adjudication. However, a cursory look at just a handful of constitutional systems suggests important differences in the practices of constitutional judges, whether in matters of form, style, or language. Focusing on independently-verified leading cases globally, a combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis offers the most comprehensive and systematic account of constitutional reasoning to date. This analysis is supported by the examination of eighteen legal systems around the world including the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Justice. Universally common aspects of constitutional reasoning are identified in this book, and contributors also examine whether common law countries differ to civil law countries in this respect.-- _cProvided by Publisher.
650		0	_aConstitutional law.
650		0	_aConstitutional courts.
650		7	_aConstitutional courts.
650		7	_aConstitutional law.
700	1		_aJakab, András, _eeditor.
700	1		_aDyevre, Arthur, _eeditor.
700	1		_aItzcovich, Giulio, _d1975- _eeditor.
999			_c1546 _d1546