Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Constitutional ratification without reason / Jeffrey A. Lenowitz.

By: Material type: TextSeries: Oxford constitutional theoryPublisher: New York, NY, USA : New York, NY, USA : Oxford University Press, 2022Copyright date: ©2022Edition: First editionDescription: xiv, 379 pages ; 25 cmContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • unmediated
Carrier type:
  • volume
ISBN:
  • 0198852347
  • 9780198852346
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • 342.02 23
LOC classification:
  • K3165 .L444 2022
Contents:
Questioning ratification -- Ratification beyond (and before) constitutions -- The invention of constitutional ratification -- Making the constituent power speak -- The unalienable right of the Berkshire constitutionalists -- Ignorance and the constituent power -- Representation through accountability -- Legitimacy types and procedures -- Legitimation device -- Conclusion.
Summary: This volume focuses on constitutional ratification, the procedure in which a draft constitution is submitted by its creators to the people or their representatives in an up or down vote determining implementation. Ratification is increasingly common and routinely recommended by experts. Nonetheless, it is neither neutral nor inevitable. Constitutions can be made without it and when it is used it has significant effects. This raises the central question of the book: should ratification be recommended? Put another way: is there a reason for treating the procedure as a default for the constitution-making process? Surprisingly, these questions are rarely asked. The procedure's worth is assumed, not demonstrated, while ratification is generally overlooked in the literature. In fact, this is the first sustained study of ratification. To address these oversights, this book defines ratification and its types, explains the procedure's effects, conceptual origins, and history, and then concentrates on finding reasons for its use. Specifically, it builds up and analyzes the three most likely normative justifications. These urge the implementation of ratification because the procedure: enables the constituent power to make its constitution; fosters representation during constitution-making; or helps create a legitimate constitution. Ultimately, these justifications are found wanting, leading to the conclusion that ratification lacks a convincing, context-independent justification. Thus, until new arguments are developed, experts should not give recommendations for ratification as a matter of course, practitioners should not reach for it uncritically, and - more generally - one should avoid the blanket application of concepts from democratic theory to extraordinary contexts such as constitution-making.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Cover image Item type Current library Home library Collection Shelving location Call number Materials specified Vol info URL Copy number Status Notes Date due Barcode Item holds Item hold queue priority Course reserves
Books Liberty General stacks 342.02 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Available LOC-LPL-00001

Includes bibliographical references (pages [323]-356) and indexes.

Questioning ratification -- Ratification beyond (and before) constitutions -- The invention of constitutional ratification -- Making the constituent power speak -- The unalienable right of the Berkshire constitutionalists -- Ignorance and the constituent power -- Representation through accountability -- Legitimacy types and procedures -- Legitimation device -- Conclusion.

This volume focuses on constitutional ratification, the procedure in which a draft constitution is submitted by its creators to the people or their representatives in an up or down vote determining implementation. Ratification is increasingly common and routinely recommended by experts. Nonetheless, it is neither neutral nor inevitable. Constitutions can be made without it and when it is used it has significant effects. This raises the central question of the book: should ratification be recommended? Put another way: is there a reason for treating the procedure as a default for the constitution-making process? Surprisingly, these questions are rarely asked. The procedure's worth is assumed, not demonstrated, while ratification is generally overlooked in the literature. In fact, this is the first sustained study of ratification. To address these oversights, this book defines ratification and its types, explains the procedure's effects, conceptual origins, and history, and then concentrates on finding reasons for its use. Specifically, it builds up and analyzes the three most likely normative justifications. These urge the implementation of ratification because the procedure: enables the constituent power to make its constitution; fosters representation during constitution-making; or helps create a legitimate constitution. Ultimately, these justifications are found wanting, leading to the conclusion that ratification lacks a convincing, context-independent justification. Thus, until new arguments are developed, experts should not give recommendations for ratification as a matter of course, practitioners should not reach for it uncritically, and - more generally - one should avoid the blanket application of concepts from democratic theory to extraordinary contexts such as constitution-making.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.