Includes bibliographical references and index.

Conclusion / The Supreme Court of the United States / András Jakab, Arthur Dyevre and Giulio Itzcovich. The High Court of Australia / Cheryl Saunders and Adrienne Stone -- The Austrian Constitutional Court / Konrad Lachmayer -- The Supreme Federal Tribunal of Brazil / Conrado Hübner Mendes -- The Supreme Court of Canada / Hugo Cyr and Monica Popescu -- The Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic / Zdeněk Kühn -- The European Court of Human Rights / Janneke Gerards -- The European Court of Justice / Giulio Itzcovich -- The French Constitutional Council / Arthur Dyevre -- The German Federal Constitutional Court / Michaela Hailbronner and Stefan Martini -- The Constitutional Court of Hungary / András Jakab and Johanna Frölich -- The Supreme Court of Ireland / Eoin Carolan -- The Israeli Supreme Court / Suzie Navot -- The Constitutional Court of Italy / Tania Groppi and Irene Spigno -- The Constitutional Court of South Africa / Christa Rautenbach and Lourens du Plessis -- The Spanish Constitutional Court / Marian Ahumada Ruiz -- The Constitutional Court of Taiwan / Wen-Chen Chang -- The Supreme Court (House of Lords) of the United Kingdom / Tamas Gyorfi -- The Supreme Court of the United States / Howard Schweber and Jennifer L. Brookhart -- Conclusion / András Jakab, Arthur Dyevre and Giulio Itzcovich.

To what extent is the language of judicial opinions responsive to the political and social context in which constitutional courts operate? Courts are reason-giving institutions, with argumentation playing a central role in constitutional adjudication. However, a cursory look at just a handful of constitutional systems suggests important differences in the practices of constitutional judges, whether in matters of form, style, or language. Focusing on independently-verified leading cases globally, a combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis offers the most comprehensive and systematic account of constitutional reasoning to date. This analysis is supported by the examination of eighteen legal systems around the world including the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Justice. Universally common aspects of constitutional reasoning are identified in this book, and contributors also examine whether common law countries differ to civil law countries in this respect.-- Provided by Publisher.